Oh yeah, what about all the drunk college girls he’s hanging around… anyone would have to be completely bombed off their a$$ to want to be around a loser buffoon like Kerry.
Earlier, I’ve made clear my intention to make my vote count twice by voting against John McCain and for Barack Hussein Obama. My motto has been:
One vote for Obama Hussien
is two votes against John McCain
I still resent and despise the treacherous coward of a two legged walking piece of trash named John McCain, but… I CANNOT BRING MYSELF TO VOTE FOR OBAMA (A.K.A. BARRY DUNHAM).
Obama has made such a presumptuous, anti-American spectacle of himself on his taxpayer funded world campaign trip that I just can’t do it. This evil, wicked, vile beast is a traitor worse than John McCain (if that’s possible) and he has publicly lied about America, impugned America, and apologized for America when he has no business and no cause to do so.
Obama isn’t even worth a used dip of snuff, let alone my vote.
From PoliPundit:
NEA Pushes Liberal Agenda At Convention
The NEA Political Party Teachers Union held their annual convention in DC las week, and as I am sure you will be shocked by, proposed outlandish, liberal, socialist agenda changes to their platform:
Washington (CNSNews.com) - Some of the almost 10,000 members of the National Education Association (NEA) attending the teachers union’s annual conference this week in the nation’s capital spoke out on the issues they hope their lobbyists will fight for during next year’s legislative session, including the establishment of a peace academy, in-state college tuition and a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants who graduate from high school.
Susie Jablinske, a first grade teacher at Central Elementary School in Edgewater, Md., said children who are in the country illegally should have the same educational rights as American children.
She proposed that the NEA add the following words to its resolution to develop programs to help minority students become college graduates, regardless of immigration status: “Access to higher education and in-state tuition, regardless of immigration status, as well as paths to legalization to undocumented high school graduates,” Jablinske proposed. {Source: CNSNews.com}
Now, to finally put to bed why the NEA is against School Choice and demand higher salaries and more teacher’s, here is the reason: More union dues for what they really care about:
Outgoing NEA President Reg Weaver, in an interview with The Hill newspaper in February, said that the NEA - with a membership of 3.2 million - plans to spend $40-$50 million to help get candidates who will help advance its agenda in the 2008 election, including the union’s endorsement and support for Democratic candidate Barack Obama.
The top tier leadership of this union now, and in years past, are subscribers Socialist Agenda, as most of what they preach and believe in is listed their.
The Senate (and El Presidente Bush) is fixin’ to give away $50 BILLION of our money to fund an effort to address a mythical problem with AIDS. From an article by By MICHAEL FUMENTO:
THE Senate is near to pass ing a massive $50 billion Emergency Plan for HIV/ AIDS Relief - a bill whose priorities are based on myth, just like virtually all anti-AIDS efforts worldwide.
The world’s top AIDS bureaucrat recently admitted the truth: “It is very unlikely that there will be a heterosexual epidemic” outside Africa, Kevin de Cock, director of the World Health Organization, told London’s Independent newspaper. His bosses at the United Nations issued an official denial - but couldn’t truly challenge his science.
The effort to “democratize” AIDS dates back to the mid-1980s, when the media and health officials began a desperate and concerted effort to divert attention and make it seem everyone was at risk. The 1985 Life magazine cover, blaring “NOW NO ONE IS SAFE FROM AIDS” in huge red letters, represents this effort. Surgeon General Everett Koop coined the term “heterosexual AIDS explosion” in 1987, while in 1993 HHS Secretary Donna Shalala told Congress that AIDS may leave “nobody left.”
Even today, the Centers for Disease Control’s HIV/AIDS Web site refuses to acknowledge any difference in the risks of AIDS between anal, vaginal or oral sex.
Peter Piot, now executive director of UNAIDS, warned as late as 1997 that “HIV will cut through Asian populations like a hot knife through cold butter.” UNAIDS’s 2001 estimate had 30 million infected adults in sub-Saharan Africa.
This sounds a lot like the Global Warming / Climate Change myth that the leftists are using to destroy the USA, doesn’t it?
Last year, the UN had to cut that Africa figure by almost half - and drop its Asia number by 38 percent from just the year before. Dr. James Chin, a former top AIDS epidemiologist at the World Health Organziation, has long declared the UN figures to be to too high and insists they still are.
So if the UN has to reduce the number of its false claim, be assured that the number CONTINUES to be far below what they say. Fumento continues:
In fact, there was never any indication AIDS had or would “break out” from the well-defined risk-behavior groups, as I was writing as far back as 1987 and in my 1990 book “The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS.”
Dittos. Those of us with more than 1/16th of a brain recognized the lies when they first began. Back to Fumento:
I’m no Nostradamus. I merely analyzed public data and studies showing how terribly difficult the disease is to transmit vaginally or orally. But the myths are still the basis for AIDS policy.
This is because of political correctness: Bush and the other RINOs don’t want to be accused of being “Anti-gay,” so more and more money is stolen from us by the government so they can find a way to keep the PERVERTS alive!
The group Fair Allocations in Research compiles statistics on federal spending to fight various diseases, compared to how many Americans each disease kills. Measured that way, we spend 21 times as much on AIDS as cancer - and 78 times what we spend on coronary artery disease, 97 times anti-stroke spending.
Folks, more people are affected by cancer, heart disease and strokes, yet the money is disproportionately spent to preserve the few (the sodomites) and to sacrifice the many (decent people with other serious diseases that need to be addressed). We live in an unjust society people!
Plus, the Ryan White Act mandates taxpayer handouts to HIV/AIDS victims of about $1.2 billion a year. We have no remotely similar program for victims of any other disease.
Do any of you think that John McCain or Obama HUSSEIN will address this injustice? HAHAHAHAHA! There’s a political dogma. An agenda. We must save the sodomites else we are bigots and lack compassion. Why can’t we have equal compassion on cancer victims then?
Robert England (who heads the charity Health Systems Workshop) recently made the same point in the British Medical Journal: “Although HIV causes 3.7 percent of [worldwide] mortality, it receives 25 percent of international health-care aid.”
DAWG! Give them 3.7 of the international health-care aid then!!! Let them die at the same rate as other diseases!!
“In the fight against AIDS, profiteering has trumped prevention,” declared Sam L. Ruteikara, co-chair of Uganda’s National AIDS-Prevention Committee, in a Washington Post essay this week. “AIDS is no longer simply a disease; it has become a multibillion-dollar industry.”
Consider: A 2008 WHO/UNAIDS/UNICEF report demands AIDS drugs for every victim worldwide, requiring spending hikes from $8.1 billion now to $35 billion by 2010. Yet AIDS remains incurable. Conversely, an African with non-resistant tuberculosis is curable with merely $25 of drugs.
Ruteikara says, “The proportion of Ugandans infected with HIV plunged from 21 percent in 1991 to 6 percent in 2002. But international AIDS experts who came to Uganda said we were wrong to try to limit people’s sexual freedom. Worse, they had the financial power to force their casual-sex agendas upon us.” And now, “as fidelity and abstinence have been subverted, Uganda’s HIV rates have begun to tick back up.”
Call your freaking Congresspeople, Senators, and The White House to tell them how SICK you are of having to pay for the government’s LIES!!
Obama Hussein is not a legitimate candidate for the Presidency of the USA. Plain and simple. He does not meet the requirements as stipulated in US law and in The Constitution of the United States of America.
From Worldnetdaily:
Bloggers are raising questions about Illinois Sen. Barack Obama’s qualifications to be U.S. president, because of the secrecy over his birth certificate and the requirement presidents be “natural-born” U.S. citizens.
Jim Geraghty, reporting on the Campaign Spot, a National Review blog, cited the “unlikely” but still circulating rumor that Obama was born not within the United States, but elsewhere, possibly Kenya.
Geraghty defined the concerns most clearly, stating: “If Obama were born outside the United States, one could argue that he would not meet the legal definition of natural-born citizen … because U.S. law at the time of his birth required his natural-born parent (his mother) to have resided in the United States for ‘10 years, at least [f]ive of which had to be after the age of 16.’”
He then points out Ann Dunham, Obama’s mother, was 18 when Obama was born “so she wouldn’t have met the requirement of five years after the age of 16.”
Geraghty continues: ” (Interestingly, apparently there isn’t much paperwork on Obama’s parents’ marriage. ‘Obama: From Promise to Power,’ page. 27: ‘Obama later confessed that he never searched for the government documents on the marriage, although Madelyn (Obama’s maternal grandmother) insisted they were legally married.’ Also note that Obama’s father apparently was not legally divorced from his first wife back in Kenya at the time, a point of contention that ultimately led to their separation.)”
The reports released to date show Obama was born in Honolulu to Barack Hussein Obama Sr., of Nyangoma-Kogelo, Kenya, and Ann Dunham, of Wichita, Kan.
According to FindLaw.com, which is cited by Geraghty, the requirements that were in force from Dec. 24, 1952 to Nov. 13, 1986, encompassing the time of Obama’s birth, state, “If only one parent was a U.S. citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least 10 years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.”
Obama’s father, a student sent to the United States from Africa, lived several places in the United States while attending class. He then returned to his homeland. Obama’s mother later married another man and moved to Indonesia.
Geraghty said the Obama campaign could “debunk” the rumors about his birth simply by releasing a copy of his birth certificate, but the campaign has so far chosen not to do that.
“The campaign cited the birth certificate in their ‘Fact Check’ on William Ayers, so presumably, someone in the campaign has access to it,” he said.
Hawaii doesn’t make public information from birth certificates.
“If the concern of the Obama campaign is that the certificate includes his Social Security number or some other data that could be useful to identity thieves, that information could easily be blocked out and the rest released. (Although I wonder if identity thieves would find Obama a tougher than usual target, since using the name on purchases would almost inevitably bring closer scrutiny.),” Geraghty said.
The Obama campaign repeatedly has declined to respond to WND requests for comment.
Read the article HERE.
John McCain is now campaiging in Mexico. Somehow I don’t think it’s going to help HIM any more than it helped Bush.
For all of the people who still think that government healthcare is a good thing, I present you with another glaring example of it’s end:
A glowing Amy Winehouse bounced back from her recent health problems to sing at Nelson Mandela’s 90th birthday concert in Hyde Park last night… Winehouse left a private London hospital on Monday after being diagnosed with early signs of emphysema following a fainting incident last week.
What has happened in the U.K. mirrors that wherever the failed idea of universal, government controlled healthcare has been implemented: Private care for the wealthy only.
When “free” healthcare becomes available, demand for services skyrocket. Government, being notoriously incompetent in managing anything, causes the system to bog down. Quality is reduced because the existing infrastructure cannot support the increased demand. Also, the amount of money available is insufficient to cover the expenses of the system, resulting in (1) higher taxes, (2) restrictions and rationing of the care that is available, (3) medical professionals leaving the “system” because of their new inability to determine their own earnings, and (4) the establishment of private sector solutions to the problem that government has created.
Ironically, the result of government healthcare is the exacerbation of the same “problem” the liberals and the ignorant seek to address: Quality healthcare is available only to the wealthy. As was the condition before government took over healthcare, private healthcare is not affordable (as it is now unaffordable in the US). Those in the middle and lower tiers of income can neither pay the cash price, nor can they afford to purchase insurance. The situation is worse since the working class is now burdened with the excessive taxation required to support the government system, so now even FEWER people are able to afford healthcare. Only the “well to do” are able to purchase private health insurance, and the ultra-wealthy opt-out entirely by paying cash. So, in the end, it’s not just the poor who have no healthcare: it’s the middle class too.
In conclusion, I summarize the conditions that caused American healthcare to become unaffordable to so many. The first cause of increased costs in the (current) American healthcare system was health insurance. As more people received health insurance as a company benefit, healthcare providers naturally became aware that more services could be given (and at higher prices) because a guranteed source of payment now existed. These higher prices compelled even more people to acquire health insurance, thus sending healthcare costs into an upward spiral.
Mandatory coverage of indigents and illegal aliens at healthcare facilities has placed added costs on healthcare. Also the cost of those who are uninsured and just cannot pay. These costs are added on to the costs that are billed to paying customers. Health insurance providers, in effort to remain viable, must charge more for premiums and cover less in services. This has resulted in a steady decline in the number of people able to afford health insurance and a steady increase in the “insured’s” unpaid portions of healthcare bills. As the cost of health insurance skyrocketed (For example, my health insurance cost has increased 1300% over the past 10 years), we now have “insured” Americans who cannot afford healthcare. Thus, “free” healthcare has tremendous appeal to the masses who fail to consider the end result.
The solution for the healthcare “problem” begins with one fundamental realization: healthcare is not a right. Healthcare is not guaranteed to the people of America by The Constitution of the United States of America. Sure, healthcare is a need, but it is not a right. The solution also requires a monumental action by the Federal Government: the Federal Government must be completely extricated from the healthcare business. Even as our healthcare system is today, the burden of the government financed and government mandated healthcare cannot be supported. By removing a HUGE portion of the demand through one single action, downward pressure on prices would be immediate. With the government OUT of healthcare, more competition would become present in the health provider and health insurance industries. Less room for greed and fraud would mean lower prices for all.
Here we have what has gone hopelessly wrong in America: corporations that exist (and thrive) by leaching off the Federal Government (and the Federal Government happy to do so in exchange for VIP privileges). We have so many corporations that have bestowed mammoth amounts of wealth upon so many individuals that it almost seems like government exists to insure the profitability of corporations. Consider the mortgage industry and Joe Biden’s Countrywide sleaze. Consider Bush’s bailout of the airlines after 9/11. Consider The bazillions of dollars flushed down the drain in New Orleans after Katrina. Consider the military contracting establishment. So, the government has the wealthy depending on it as well as the poor people depending on it. All that remains productive in the USA is the dwindling number of people in the middle.
Blackwater is much the same. They landed hundreds of millions of dollars in contracts from the USA… that’s you (if you pay taxes) and me (I pay taxes). They lured thousands of soldiers out of the military and ex-soldiers out of retirement by offering them the big bucks associated with a corporation given complete immunity from responsibility for their operations.
Now this thing has gone to court over a botched flight in Afghanistan. The same company that demanded to be free of Iraqi law now claims that it is subject to Afghanistan’s sharia law and therefore cannot be held responsible for their negligence.
First, let me make clear: The people who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan as mercenaries are selfish, greedy hucksters… NOT heros. They took the risk… they were (over)compensated for that risk… and if they die, it’s tough stuff all over. But still, the shady, greedy, corporate monolith known as Blackwater should be held accountable for their incompetence whenever and wherever it is manifested.
Read more about this HERE.
We already know that Jihadist Obama HUSSEIN is not QUALIFIED to be the President, we now know that he is not ELIGIBLE to be President under American law. This is a great comment to a post over at Michelle Malkin’s blog:
Barack Obama is not legally a U.S. Natural-born citizen according to the law on the books at the time of his birth, which falls between “December 24, 1952 to November 13, 1986? . Presidential office requires a natural-born citizen if the child was not born to two U.S. Citizen parents, which of course is what exempts John McCain though he was born in the Panama Canal. US Law very clearly stipulates: “…If only one parent was a U.S. Citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.” Barack Obama’s father was not a U.S. Citizen and Obama’s mother was only 18 when Obama was born, which means though she had been a U.S. Citizen for 10 years, (or citizen perhaps because of Hawai’i being a territory) the mother fails the test for being so for at least 5 years **prior to** Barack Obama’s birth, but *after* age 16. It doesn’t matter *after* . In essence, she was not old enough to qualify her son for automatic U.S. Citizenship. At most, there were only 2 years elapsed since his mother turned 16 at the time of Barack Obama’s birth when she was 18 in Hawai’i. His mother would have needed to have been 16+5= 21 years old, at the time of Barack Obama’s birth for him to have been a natural-born citizen. As aformentioned, she was a young college student at the time and was not. Barack Obama was already 3 years old at that time his mother would have needed to have waited to have him as the only U.S. Cizen parent. Obama instead should have been naturalized, but even then, that would still disqualify him from holding the office.
*** Naturalized citizens are ineligible to hold the office of President. *** Though Barack Obama was sent back to Hawaii at age 10, all the other info does not matter because his mother is the one who needed to have been a U.S. Citzen for 10 years prior to his birth on August 4, 1961, with 5 of those years being after age 16. Further, Obama may have had to have remained in the country for some time to protect any citizenship he would have had, rather than living in Indonesia. Now you can see why Obama’s aides stopped his speech about how we technically have more than 50 states, because it would have led to this discovery. This is very clear cut and a blaring violation of U.S. Election law. I think the Gov. Of California would be very insterested in knowing this if Obama were elected President without being a natural-born U.S. Citizen, and it would set precedence. Stay tuned to your TV sets because I suspect some of this information will be leaking through over the next several days…
DAWG! This guy really is about flaunting his illegal behavior in all of our faces, isn’t he?
Read more HERE.
And there came a leper to him, beseeching him, and kneeling down to him, and saying unto him, If thou wilt, thou canst make me clean. And Jesus, moved with compassion, put forth [his] hand, and touched him, and saith unto him, I will; be thou clean.
Mark 1:40-41
As Jesus encounters a leper, we can learn some things about Him and about how those who are “Christians” should behave.
First, think about the leper. This man was probably not very appealing to look at. He probably had sores and, being banished to places outside the city, he may not have been very clean. In fact, lepers were most frequently found ostracized, wandering outside the city. Regardless, this man was sure to be unattractive and undesirable. In spite of this man’s disease and undesirable features, Jesus did what most modern “Christians” wouldn’t even think about doing: He touched him.
Then there’s Jesus. The emotion that prompted Jesus to touch this man was compassion. Jesus saw this man and did not see a leper. He did not see someone to avoid, but someone to draw near to. He had no regard for the rules of “uncleanness.” He didn’t care that this man was rejected by family and society. Jesus saw a man who had great need. Jesus saw a man who was desperate for help. Jesus had compassion. This compassion was not the kind that “Christians” of today have: Jesus’ compassion moved Him to touch this man.
Can you imagine this leper? Here was a man who likely had not been touched at all for years. Here’s a man who may not have felt sincere love and compassion for decades. Imagine how he felt when the kind, tender hand of Jesus, touched him. No wonder this man spread the news abroad… sure he was healed, but he was also cared for. He was somebody. Now he could rejoin the ranks of the living. Now he knew that Jesus was on his side.
What I’ve noticed at least here in Greenville, South Carolina, those who are supposed to be “Christians” are largely uninvolved in the lives of those who are desperate; those who are in need of someone genuinely motivated and moved; those who need a touch from someone who actually cares.
It’s nice to know that Jesus still touches people. He’s moved with compassion towards all people, but particularly to the unappealing and undesirable. The poor and the needy. The prisoners, the ostracized. But remember, Jesus is not physically present with us right now. He works through those who genuinely know Him to touch people who are in need and to show the compassion of Christ here on earth while He is away.
Go ahead… next homeless person you see, rather than mocking him or her, rather than pretending you don’t see… go ahead and let the compassion of Jesus move you to touch that person and meet a need in that person’s life. That is what Jesus would do.
You are currently browsing the archives for the Misc category.
