Why is it that when Mrs. Bill Clinton shows up to speak to a predominately black audience that she talks differently?  She gets this weird, phony, pseudo-southern accent with a bizarre drawl.  Her intensional “dumbing down” of her speech indicates a very strange impediment that should demand therapy.  Unless of course she is trying to cater to the black community by trying to have solidarity of speech?  Surely she is not so transparent as that!  One would think that the audience would be offended that this extremely wealthy white woman bigot would show up to speak to them talking differently to them than she does to white audiences.  To date, we have no indication that here disgusting vernacular hurt public opinion either at Selma or at David Dukes Al Sharpton’s convention.

We will continue to do our part to expose Mrs. Bill Clinton’s bigoted  agenda.  How about her hypocrisy talking about things under the carpet in the Oval Office?  I wonder how long it took to get her husband’s semen stains out of the rug before the new president could move in?

Read more breaking commentary on Mrs. Bill Clinton at the National Review Online HERE.

Somehow I just can’t imagine these elitist socialist fascist Hollywood snobs and their partners in the Democrat political arena using just one square of toilet paper per sitting.

If you though Al Gore was a stupid, ignorant, fool, what would we then call Sheryl Crow and Laurie David?  Imbeciles? Ludicrous? Schizoid?  They want to use a whole role for themselves if they want to, but all us common peons can only use one square, or 2 or 3 squares in case of an emergency approved by the fascist TP regulatory agency.

What’s even worse is that people are out there who actually listen to this nonsense!  If the one’s saying this nonsense are schizoid, what do we call the sub-human irrational citizens who actually believe these people?  Freaks? Yes! Idiots? Yes! Functionally illiterate? Yes! Brain-dead? Yes!  Still even more scary is that these mindless beasts vote!   UGH!

Read the article HERE.

Glenn McConnell, writing an opinion for The State injects some good reason into the flag debate that was recently re-kindled by out-of-state migrant Steve Spurrier.

No need for another battle over the flag
By GLENN MCCONNELL - Guest columnist

As we all know, until 2001, the Confederate battle flag flew atop the South Carolina state house dome. For many years a debate raged over the proper location for the embattled flag. It is instructive to remember the arguments made at the time.

Those who opposed keeping the battle flag on the dome said it should not fly in a position of sovereignty. They argued it should be removed from the dome to a place of historical context.

Others said the battle flag memorialized those who answered the call of their elected government and made the supreme sacrifice on behalf of their state. They argued that moving the flag from the dome to a different location would not satisfy critics permanently — that soon they would be making harsher demands.

After years of debate, a bipartisan compromise was finally crafted. The compromise required the Confederate battle flag to be removed from the dome and relocated to the Confederate Soldier Monument. Moreover, we required the flag to fly in a size and shape and to be made with materials that were historically accurate — a soldier’s flag at a soldier’s monument.

To underscore the rich diversity of our common heritage, even before we were able to apss theConfederate flag compromise, we agreed to erect a monument of similar size to memorialize our state’s important African-American heritage. Its purpose is to honor the heroes of the civil rights movement and other African-Americans who have contributed so richly to our state’s history. I was honored to serve as chairman of the commission that created the African-American History Monument.

Taken together, the two monuments demonstrate eloquently that tolerance is the cement of a free society. Without it, we cannot have either unity or diversity based on mutual respect. For all fair-minded people, the long controversy was resolved. Finally our state could move on and address other issues.

Today, unfortunately, once again, the voices of intolerance have returned. I realize some of them, like football coach Steve Spurrier, are well-intended. Others are merely returning to the trough of controversy, to feed on passions, to appeal to prejudice and to inflame constituents. Such irresponsible grandstanding threatens to unravel the fabric of mutual respect and to divide our state for decades to come.

What does the Confederate battle flag stand for as it flies adjacent to the soldier’s monument? At such a location, no one can persuasively argue that it represents bigotry or slavery. It is a soldier’s battle flag, and surely we can all respect the valor of soldiers. They left their homes and families to answer the call of their elected government. Most didn’t own slaves…

 Read the entire article at The State

The State has been whining about the number of HIV/AIDS patients in South Carolina who are on waiting lists for life saving medical treatment. Here’s what one clueless editor had to say about this on Wednesday:

More than 80 percent of HIV/AIDS patients on waiting lists for life-saving medications in the United States and its territories live in South Carolina. And many on the Palmetto State’s waiting list could stay there until they die — unless legislators exercise leadership and compassion and approve enough money to serve them all.

These truly are the words of one who is educated beyond his intelligence.  Where does this person get off?  First, doesn’t he realize that money does not solve all problems?  Secondly, doesn’t he realize that money in the state is of finite supply?  What does it take for these phony, duplicitous, bleeding-heart liberals to understand that government is not the all-powerful, all-knowing source of life?  Finally, why does this man want to steal more money from people like you and me and give it to other people?

The truth of the matter is that the overwhelming majority of people with HIV/AIDS have it because of reckless moral decisions they have made.  Maybe some of them are the ones who actually deliberately try to catch AIDS.  Most of these are homosexuals. A lot of them are prostitutes and drug users. Furthermore, the truth is that I’d rather not have the government take my money and give it to most people who have HIV/AIDS!  If they didn’t want to have AIDS, they should have decided not to be homosexual.  They should have decided not to be promiscuous. They should have thought before joining in the careless games of youth. They should have not taken to illicit drug use. That’s why I say, “Let most of them die.”

Like most of you, I am dealing with health insurance costs that are skyrocketing because of people’s irresponsible behavior.  I didn’t ask people to go skiing and then require hundreds of thousands of dollars in treatment because they crashed and became paralyzed.  I didn’t invite on single person (until Earth Day) to smoke.  I never forced anyone to be overweight.  More specifically, I never encouraged anyone to be sexually immoral.  Every time some pervert comes down with gonorrhea, syphilis,  HIV, AIDS, etc. its even more outrageous.  I didn’t make them take their clothes off and do their thing. I never injected anyone with drugs even with a used needle. Still, everytime someone loads down the system with these high cost ailments that require the big bucks to treat, MY insurance bill goes up!

So listen, Warren Bolton, I am already paying MORE THAN MY FAIR SHARE into the system through insurance and taxes.  Rather than forcing the money from us, why not put it on the ballot as a question:

Should we (A) raise taxes so all responsible people have to pay more of the healthcare bills of irresponsible people that have engaged in perverted or immoral behavior? or (B) Because we should not be responsible for the bad decisions of others, should we let them die?

I choose option B.

The holier than thou socialists who run most of the nation’s newspapers are just giddy another Earth Day. The State is one of them as they attempt to portray Earth Day a non-partisan and universal understanding that we must reverse the damage that we have done to the earth. BAH HUMBUG!

I am so sick of the revisionist left-wing socialist anti-American revisionists who insist on re-interpreting everything. Earth Day has always been sponsored by socialists who hate America. The environmentalist movement from its inception has been replete with anti-war, anti-capitalist, anti-constitutionalist, anti-truth and justice, and anti-logic freaks who want to tax us into oblivion so the USA can ultimately be ranked below Guyana in power, wealth, and influence.

So this Earth Day, please smoke an extra cigarette.  Go ahead and mow the lawn and fire-up the weed eaters. Go for a Sunday drive (especially if your car smokes), and open a can of freon.  Hey Al Gore and all the evil-minions of politically correct ecology won’t do one single thing to help save the planet: they all want YOU to do it.  Again I say BAH HUMBUG!

All these states are fighting over who’s going to have the first primary caucus of the 2008 primary race.  As Hugh Hewitt observes, this is getting ridiculous.  With some primaries hogging up January of 2008, the only option for those wanting to vie for the opening salvo is to conduct primaries in 2007.

Since everyone’s embroiled with the race to be first, I suggest that some states should hold their primary for the 2012 presidential race this June.  Why not?

Another baseball fan has become famous.  He was shining a flashlight at Shea Stadium and ended up in the Gulag.  His  life is now in the pathway of ruin for fiddling with a “small streamline flashlight.”  I’m sure it used a top-secret military technology to overcome daylight to produce a blinding light.  Give me a break!  Suppose he really did shine the flashlight? So what?  There’s no way a small flashlight is going to endanger anyone.  It’s just a couple whiny-butt sissy Braves players who obviously had the desire (and the power) to destroy someone’s life.  Now this man is stuck in the legal pipeline with a free lawyer from which he will probably get as much defense as he can pay for.

Read the article HERE. 

Think way back to the sleaziest, most corrupt president in American history: Bill Clinton. Remember the lies? Remember his womanizing? Remember his adulteries? Remember his hatred for the nation’s military? Remember the corruption at the highest levels? Remember Janet Reno? Remember the FBI files? Remember the Rose Law Firm (Oh, sorry, that was Mrs. Bill Clinton)? Remember the horse ranch? Remember The Clinton Body Count? Remember Sandy “The nation’s secrets are stuffed in my pants” Berger? Remember his legitimization of sodomites in the military? Remember how he tooled with the economic numbers, allowing people to think the economy better than it was? Remember how Clinton sat idly by as terrorists attacked our nation again and again? Remember how he got us in the Balkan quagmire of Bosnia and Serbia? Reemember Madeline Albright, the most inept, incompetent, anti-American Secretary of State EVER? Remember Waco? Remember the Cuban boy whom Clinton forcibly returned to the barbarians in Cuba? On and on it goes.

How would you like 8 more years of that crap? That’s exactly what you will get if Mrs. Bill Clinton gets elected - only worse. Mrs. Bill Clinton is a dangerous, vicious socialist criminal who is probably many hundredfold corrupt as her buffoon of a husband.

You were probably in the same state of bewilderment both times the scumbag got elected: We were left asking how in the world the American people could vote for a known criminal, an avowed liar, and an in-your-face whore monger sleaze ball for president! We were just amazed that there was anything left of the USA when we finally got rid of the clown, Bill Clinton.

Mrs. Bill Clinton is definitely a curse upon this nation. She has done absolutely nothing during her presence in the Senate and has no experience that would suggest that she could be a competent leader. She has ascended to Democrat power through threats, bullying, blackmail, and lies. In fact, if her last name was not “Clinton,” she would have been laughed off the national stage long ago for the dirty disgusting joke that she really is.

All that’s bad enough. Do we really want to try to endure through 8 more years of Bill Clinton? I trow not.

Clinton Says Husband Would Be Ambassador

Apr 21, 6:26 PM (ET)

By MIKE GLOVER

MARSHALLTOWN, Iowa (AP) - Hillary Rodham Clinton said Saturday that if she is elected president, she would make her husband a roaming ambassador to the world, using his skills to repair the nation’s tattered image abroad.

“I can’t think of a better cheerleader for America than Bill Clinton, can you?” the Democratic senator from New York asked a crowd jammed into a junior high school gymnasium. “He has said he would do anything I asked him to do. I would put him to work.”

Clinton spoke at a town hall-style meeting Saturday where she took questions from about 200 people. When asked what role the former president would play in her administration, she left no doubt it would be an important one.

“I’m very lucky that my husband has been so experienced in all of these areas,” said Clinton, who pointed to the diplomatic assignments her husband has carried out since leaving office, such as raising money for tsunami victims.

Although former president Clinton was impeached after an affair with a White House intern, he remains a very popular figure in much of the world and is considered an effective diplomat. He remained in office after the Senate failed to convict him.

That’s precisely what America needs in the wake of a war in Iraq that’s left America isolated and hated throughout much of the world, Hillary Clinton said.

“I believe in using former presidents, particularly what my husband has done, to really get people around the world feeling better about our country,” she said. “We’re going to need that. Right now they’re rooting against us and they need to root for us.”

The former president can also be a political asset to his wife’s campaign. While his image with the electorate is mixed, he remains immensely popular among Democrats.

When it was announced last year that he would be the main speaker at the Iowa Democratic Party’s largest annual fundraiser, the event sold out overnight.

On Saturday, Hillary Clinton chatted with activists in Marshalltown and mingled at a coffee shop in Newton before raising money for Rep. Leonard Boswell.

Throughout the day, Clinton toughened her rhetoric by offering sharply populist themes.

“Rich people didn’t make American great,” Clinton said. “It was the middle class who made this country great.”

She denounced the Bush administration, which she said has left the government incompetent. “They have shown contempt for our government,” Clinton said. “We’ve got to get back to having qualified people, not cronies, serving in the government of the United States.”

She said Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have done lasting damage. “I don’t think we know all the damage that this president and vice president have done,” Clinton said.

She was scheduled to visit Dubuque on Sunday.

In Marshalltown, she was pressed on immigration issues in a city where a raid at a local meatpacking plant led to the detention of nearly 100 workers. Clinton called for more assistance for cities with significant numbers of undocumented workers.

“You’ve got to have more help for communities when you have a lot of undocumented workers because they have costs associated with that and they don’t set immigration policy,” Clinton said.

She also said any immigration reform must be tougher on businesses that hire illegal immigrants.

She said nothing will affect the issue until leaders of countries, such as Mexico, improve the economic lives for millions living in poverty.

Clinton also said she would raise taxes for the wealthy, who she said “aren’t paying their fair share.” She also praised the economic policies of her husband that brought budget surpluses.

“We need to get back to fiscal responsibility,” she said.

Read the article HERE.

Sparxx over at Polipundit seems surprised that an ultimate bigot such as Mrs. Bill Clinton would be one to speak out about bigotry. As a rule, the Democrats speak out first about what they themselves are doing. That’s all I have to say. I suggest you go over to PoliPundit to read more of Mrs. Bill Clinton the hypocrite.

Folks, we have a Majority Leader in the Senate that is not only a Demofascist, but he seems to have a serious personality disorder. He has already proven that he is a danger to America, but now we are assured that he is a danger to himself as well (Come on Harry, you know what you need to do). You can read some summaries about Personality Disorders HERE. From the web site:

The DSM-IV-TR: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association, defines a personality disorder as an enduring pattern of inner experience and behavior that deviates markedly from the expectation of the individual’s culture, is pervasive and inflexible, has an onset in adolescence or early adulthood, is stable over time, and leads to distress or impairment.

As a courtesy to this freak and to insane Demofascists everywhere, I hereby provide the following diagnosis of Reid free of charge:

Antisocial Personality Disorder: Lack of regard for the moral or legal standards in the local culture, marked inability to get along with others or abide by societal rules. Sometimes called psychopaths or sociopaths.

Harry Reid must be a psychopath for him to actually say that Democrats have a long track record of supporting the troops. Also, he’s completely lost his grip by throwing “We have to lose Iraq” temper tantrums. Maybe he knows something more than we do: the situation in Iraq is steadily improving to the point of total success.

Our society demands that America be victorious and successful in every endeavor. Harry Reid has lost touch with this fact and is now on course to finish his pathetic life in a haze of super humiliation (his crimes and immoral conduct have already completely humiliated him).

Read more about Reid’s implosion over at Malkin’s blog.